I was at work yesterday when I checked the news at lunch and noticed the article I'm blogging today. It had just been released and I recognized immediately that it was good blog material--I would have put it on right away if that had been possible. I thought the story made an important observation, one that went along well with what I mentioned in yesterday's post--that the role of religion was noticeably pronounced at the presidential inauguration. It also reminded me of what I had said in my January 12 post, Faith and Politics on the Right.
After decades of ceding God to the GOP, at least in the public square, Democrats – with President Obama in the lead – are speaking with a fuller religious voice. The watchword? Inclusiveness.
It's a voice that signals openness at a time when diversity in American religious life is rising.
"We know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus – and nonbelievers," Mr. Obama said in Tuesday's inaugural address.
Wednesday's National Prayer Service, a tradition since George Washington's inauguration, featured faith leaders chosen "to symbolize America's traditions of religious tolerance and freedom," said the 2009 Presidential Inaugural Committee. It included, for the first time, a sermon delivered by a woman.
For Obama, the broad outreach into the faith community isn't confined to ceremonies but is emerging as a key element in his approach to coalition-building, say religious leaders who worked on the transition.
"Barack Obama is himself a person of faith, but he also believes that the faith community has a real role to play in creating the kind of social change we need now," says the Rev. Jim Wallis, president of Sojourners, a network of Christian social activists.
Indeed, religious groups have been broadly advising the Obama transition team on issues ranging from poverty to criminal justice to foreign policy. "To move from a consuming, polluting, poverty-creating economy to one that conserves, is a good steward of the environment, and focuses on bringing people out of poverty, that's more than a structural crisis, it's a spiritual one," says Mr. Wallis.
Obama's predisposition to stake a big tent that includes a broad range of faith traditions has been evident early.
Continue reading
It's important to bear in mind that religious inclusiveness doesn't equate with pluralism in the sense that all things are equal. It's quite possible and even commendable to have an inclusive attitude toward the faith expressions of others. In fact such an attitude is the backbone of ecumenical dialogue. Our being inclusive of others beliefs and values does not suggest that we adopt their beliefs as our own, but that we approach one another with the recognition that although we differ we should show tolerance and respect toward one another even when our differences cause us to disagree sharply.
The article goes on to quote Stephen Prothero, a religion professor at Boston University who says, "there's a possibility that Democrats are going to end up being more religious than Republicans." I believe that such a statement holds some merit when we consider the overall religious makeup of the United States and the real possibility that the administration will promote an inclusive expression of faith.
Often within particular expressions of faith we have a tendency to be inward looking--not always being aware of the vast variety of faith expressions or their values, which often differ from ours. However, as I learned years ago in interfaith work--and by studying with Protestants--there's a big segment of society that considers itself to be strongly religious and that does not identify with evangelicalism or the religious right. Nor do they identify with the values of Catholicism, which is perhaps less surprising.
I recall how I felt when I first learned that one of the major denominations in my state has a pro-choice statement, while also claiming in the same statement to remain essentially anti-abortion. Of course for Catholics and evangelicals this is difficult to understand. However, while we may rightly disagree with such beliefs and statements they still remain as part of the plural expression of the American religious tapestry--an expression with which I can easily see democrats being comfortable.
Again, being inclusive of other faiths in no way means that we must adopt morally unacceptable positions. Rather I tend more to think of true inclusivity as also having to do with the unwavering celebration of our particular religious identity, doctine, and values. A truly inclusive environment demands a respectful attitude and tolerance for each faith expression, and it acts as a safeguard against persecution, ignornace, and prejudice.
Over time it will be interesting to observe how much of the attention to religion was merely part of the inaugural pageantry, and how much will carry over into the administration's long-term identity.
Recent Comments